Conflicted is a psycholigical condition, not just a term;

I am conflicted. I owe allegiance of some kind to the journal. I want (my timebound inclination is) to go back and take up as if nothing had happened on the old periodical. We should all note reflexive case as such;

Phoenix Journal can POST, or 'we would not be _here_.'

I also want to leave the top entry at the top for a while.

I expect that there is a certain obligation to specify the three attempts to 'go viral.'

A blog admits both to itself and others that it will be read by many. As such both organized order and explanations are helpful. As to order, I could re-POST the instigation, followed by the three efforts in order. Without its coherent explanation, the efforts might be misconstrued. With it, my motives may be misconstrued.

I was pretty forthright about my motives. Anger motivated my ferocity. I did not specify the object of the anger; its causes, inceptions and tinder. Anger does not subject itself to reason easily - I'm pretty sure I was mad at something Orwellian - Big Brother has always suffered a jaundiced reputation.

We know the founding Fathers were fanatical. Their worst obsessions centered on the Big Brother aspect of the King of England.

My question is this:

Were the founding fathers paranoid or are these abuses actually POSSIBLE?

The anger was supposed to have been Patriotic.

Upon review Slashdot journal space has been re-ordered. A co-incidental timing must surely have an intriguing explanation. I proceed to implement my 1st Amendment Right guaranteed promise with a trepidation worthy of a performer.